They don?t say so in the property ads of course, but shockingly, they could stress: ?No kids? without sanction. Nobody cares: it is discrimination, but not illegal.
One correspondent relocated to the UK and started flat-hunting. They were staying for about a year as mature post-grad students. They had money in the form of state funding, excellent references and (when problems in securing a house became clear) would pay six months rent upfront. Only trouble was, they would become proud parents about four months after moving in.
He?s Canadian, and didn?t say whether this would be tolerated in the USA, but he did seem astounded. They were after a two bed flat, and sound like dream tenants. Why not let them move in? I never heard whether they found anywhere.
Elsewhere, my blogging friend My Shitty Twenties is trying to find a new home, closer to her friends, family, hopefully with a garden for her cherubic son ?Tom?. Suddenly the landlord suddenly decided she didn?t want a school age child in the house (Tom is 6). Their decision came after she had paid a holding fee and the actual deposit, so the letting agent didn?t have a legal leg to stand on. Coincidentally, just after she had viewed her perfect house, a childless couple pulled up outside.
Another potential tenant is a single parent, but her landlord rejected her after some intrusive question, assuming she would be on benefits (she isn?t.)
Really young children can be mischievous, but their misdemeanours usually involve tiny trikes bumping into skirting, or some drawing on the walls (mostly washable now, or covered with a coat of emulsion.)
Social housing is a fleeting, disappearing dream. All tenants will rely on the private sector, including, or rather especially, families with children. Rented houses are often inadequate, and anyway, it?s much more lucrative to let a house as an HMO, as landlords can ?maximise profit? cramming in more renters, using the lounge as another bedroom (kind landlords don?t) or rent to a couple.
Blinkered, prejudiced rentiers believe all single parents are scroungers, claiming benefits when really they are in full time, possibly well-paid, work. They assume that couples will not be signing on, as one of them will always be in full employment, when in this climate, that is not the case.
Private landlords must now fulfil a social role, when they are accustomed to exercising whimsical prejudices and capricious choices with impunity. Their word is law. Families can be given notice every six months, with children settled in good local schools (there might be no places if they are compelled to move) or just secure and happy.
It?s the opposite of the odious child-catcher in Chitty Chitty Bang-Bang. Landlords do not gather children, the push them away.
The private sector is not family friendly. It just isn?t.
http://rentergirl.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/made-for-sharing.html
Source: http://rentergirl.blogspot.com/2012/09/not-suitable-fot-children.html
kid cudi ben breedlove matt barnes hcm loretta lynn gene kelly zoe saldana zooey deschanel and joseph gordon levitt
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.